In spite of Stamford Primary School's fervent efforts to move towards ICT learning and teaching, the extent of ICT implementation within the confines of the classroom is far and few. Granted, for the subject English, teachers are encouraged to flash powerpoint slides at the start of lessons as well as encourage the use of ICT in learning centres. Mathematics teachers are also encouraged to come up with creative methods in line with ICT teaching to deliver any lesson. Teachers are also required to submit ideas on ICT teaching and learning during time-tabled time. These are little steps taken in Stamford to ensure that ICT is perpetuated. However, due to the student demographic, progression towards achieving the aims of the third Masterplan is at a standstill unless resources are provided to ensure that students have access to ICT tools.
Judging for the Masterplans, it is evident that ICT learning and teaching is a two-way street. As much as teachers are expected to impart ICT skills to the students, students are also expected to practise such skills within the confines of their own time. Hence, if students do not even have computers of their own to practise on, how are they going to hone their skills? Therefore, it is imperative to provide the resources so as students can increase their exposure to ICT.
From primary one to primary two, students are taught touch-typing, an integral aspect when it comes to ICT learning. This is taught by the English subject teacher, and is conducted once a week for two 30-minute periods. In my view, the paltry time assigned for ICT self-learning limits the students' exposure to ICT tools. On top of that, students with access to computers at home are encouraged to complete assignments through an online portal, LEAD.com. However, due to the student demographic, most students do not have access to computers at home. Thus, they will have to squeeze in time during touch-typing to complete the aforementioned assignments. The school tries to combat this downside by allowing students to use the computer lab facilities after school hours in assigned time brackets.
I feel that in order for Stamford to be in line with the aims of the Masterplans, sufficient resources have to be provided to ensure that maximum exposure is provided for every student. This will then allow for similar progression when it comes to ICT learning. At the same time, teachers can conduct ICT independent learning efficiently and effectively without the need to revisit the framework or basics each time. Stamford has already fulfilled the aims of the first ICT plans by introducing ICT tools such as computers in each classroom, making sure that teachers are equipped with basic skills i.e. use of email, powerpoint, word and excel and ensuring that students are equipped with typing skills. However, it is apparent that the basic skills are not upgraded as the students proceeded up the level. This can be seen by the trouble they faced when it comes to basic internet searches.
In retrospect, Stamford does take necessary steps in order to equip the teachers with the necessary skills and information for ICT learning and teaching to be conducted. Exposing teachers to sharing platforms such as ANIMATE widens our creativity when it comes to implementing ICT in our teaching. Teachers are also encouraged to donate ideas to MOE ideas bank, where ideas can come in form of ICT learning and teaching. In addition, sharing of ICT resources through the sharing folders enables easy accessibility.
While Stamford has met the aims of the first and second Masterplans, it has yet to come close when it comes to implementing the third Masterplan. As previously attested, it all boils down to availability of resources. I believe much can be resolved if more resources is provided to encourage independent ICT learning among students.